Such hideous paper have not seen, I noticed some time ago, speaking about the commission's report Tagliavini about Russian-Georgian war. Should take their words ago: Report of the IAC on the causes of the crash of President Kaczynski was even more disgusting.
What struck me most in the report?
First small preduvedomlenie: in democracies agencies have long learned to compose a comprehensible, efficient reports posted on the Internet. Anyone who opens Report of the Commission on 9 / 11, read a folding narrative, FACTS, logic and language do not yield the best examples of journalism.
Not that Russian reports: They are designed to spoon lying drowned in a vat irrelevant details.
For example, a report on the causes of fire in the club "Lame Horse" kilometer pages перечисляет ГОСТы, акты, параметры, справки о датах выдачи справок и пр., но в том, что касается воздействия пенополистирола на человеческий организм (а в «Хромой Horse people fell down dead, breathing in poisonous smoke, many do not even scorched), the report says modestly: "It is not known for lack of laboratory animals (mice). A report on the causes of the disaster at the power plant, listing all the way down to the color of fire extinguishers in the engine room station, modestly managed to ignore question, for how many months of vibration exploded hydro exceeded the norm.
In this sense, the MAC statement corresponds exactly to what visitors are which reports on the power plant. There are a lot of some nonsense, unnecessary and often malicious: "Every end of the GDP at the airport included groundwater terminal strip safety, "" a valid certificate of airworthiness for the aircraft by the Polish side has not been submitted, "" insurance of the crew did not have "; "Incidents on the site found a set of RLE in Polish," "Tupolev" the fact of an official translation of the documentation does not confirm, "" minimum number of stewards of 4 people, but actually on the plane, "there were three flight attendants."
What does the number of flight attendants, insurance crews and ground strip at the ends of the runway to have the plane crashed?
to the aircraft - no. This is - meaningless flow of words, which should impress amount of work done by the commission.
But - and this second - sometimes in this thread caught mere diamonds. For example: "determine the status light system at the time of AP (Incidents - YL) could not be "" found that the lights of the second and third groups are not available, there are pieces of lighting fixtures, cord is cut, "" lights on the first group (900m.) divided light filters, light bulbs burned out three one "; in the code beacon from the 6 bulbs missing 2.
In other words, lights (not on the runway, and on the approach) is not burned, because long ago been broken. You guys are so planted and Putin?
Thirdly, the abundance of words hides a lack of information. Because no one line report MAK no answers to critical questions.
The main question is very simple.
April 10, 2010. to useless, disorganized jitney airfield "North" Polish President boarded the plane. And on April 7 to the same plane sat Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. Question: Prime Minister delivered for extra seating equipment or not? Or he had sat on the airfield, where "on the lamp, the first group of broken filters? And if the equipment is delivered, what and why it not used for landing Kaczynski?
The report MAC word about it, although there cupola entitled "Preparation of the airfield to receive special flights 7 and 10 April, "and it poured a bucket of meaningless phrases. In particular, it says that on April 2 at the airport came a "zamkomandira in / h 21350" for providing special flights on 7 and 10 April, but what he did and his name, we are not told.
There are still several issues: why managers spoke in Russian? Why managers clearly understand where and how the plane down?
report's authors did not forget to remind us that the plane had 3 flight attendants instead of the 4-x but forgot to bring transcripts of negotiations with the dispatcher, from which it is clear that the controller gives the aircraft the wrong team.
Finally - and this is in the fourth - Direct mechanism for the disaster and the actions of pilots, leading to it, in my opinion, describes frightening and true. And I personally learned quite a lot. For example, that the crew was down too fast - the vertical velocity was 8 m / s instead of the usual 4-5m / sec. (He declined so quickly because the long-range drive came at too high altitudes.)
that someone - probably the navigator - at the moment to reduce clicked on the button permutation pressure altimeter and height of the instrument immediately changed to 160 m in the wrong direction, and, apparently, the pilots did not notice that the button pressed, and pressed it by mistake at all - instead of next.
The crew of the presidential plane made not one but several serious mistakes, and this is the typical character of the development of any catastrophe - the harder the situation, than incorrect previous decision, the less you understand where you are and what you are doing - the more you make the cumulative error.
And this difficult situation was undoubtedly angered the president of Poland and the presence in the cockpit drunken Polish Air Force Commander Gen. Blasika who like and Chief the crew was, and fog the glass saw, and did not give any orders. This is for sure - when you have drunk is behind Air Force Commander, then you will fall too quickly, and click to confuse.
But the question is - how this difficult situation was compounded by the nonsense that carried the manager, and the lack of lights second and the third group, which had hoped to consider a pilot on approach to the GDP?
IAC Report argues that the incompetence of Manager to the catastrophe does "not affected". Wow! That is a drunken commander in chief (of which the signs carefully, what piece of meat to the direction in which bounced because he was the soul of the pilots, rather than sat there, wear your) - influenced, and the dispatcher - no! And the fact that three days before the two prime ministers, the Russian and Polish, forgot to take the President of Poland with a in Katyn - is on the pilots had no effect!
Moreover. The report says that "the team manager of termination to reduce" Horizon 101 "was quite enough to take the right decision - to leave the second round. " This outright lie. Team Manager, was featured in 10.40.53,4, and the plane crashed into the ground in 10.40.59,3 - through 6 seconds. 20 seconds before the collision, when it rang alarm TAWS, the dispatcher calmly confirms: "Headlights turn on (10.40.32)", "on the course, glide path (10.40.39,9). This
impression that the report's authors have forgotten that their bureaucratic work to be read not only by Messrs. Levitin, Medvedev and Putin.
small detail. Know as the report describes the history of the MAC with neprizemleniem President Kaczynski in Georgia? It is written that "12 August 2008" presidential airplane to fly on the route Warsaw - Tallinn - Warsaw - Simferopol - Ganja. " And that the pilot refused to land in Tbilisi, quote, "due to lack of relevant aeronautical and other information on the new aerodrome of destination. " And we thought that there was war ...
That's the little bureaucratic masterpiece - about the pilot, who had refused to land the plane in Tbilisi because of lack of relevant aeronautical information - and passed on would be best MAC style report if not even one detail.
very young. Quite small.
know how many times in the MAC report mentions the word "Katyn"? Once. In describing the application flights, which gave the Polish side.
What struck me most in the report?
First small preduvedomlenie: in democracies agencies have long learned to compose a comprehensible, efficient reports posted on the Internet. Anyone who opens Report of the Commission on 9 / 11, read a folding narrative, FACTS, logic and language do not yield the best examples of journalism.
Not that Russian reports: They are designed to spoon lying drowned in a vat irrelevant details.
For example, a report on the causes of fire in the club "Lame Horse" kilometer pages перечисляет ГОСТы, акты, параметры, справки о датах выдачи справок и пр., но в том, что касается воздействия пенополистирола на человеческий организм (а в «Хромой Horse people fell down dead, breathing in poisonous smoke, many do not even scorched), the report says modestly: "It is not known for lack of laboratory animals (mice). A report on the causes of the disaster at the power plant, listing all the way down to the color of fire extinguishers in the engine room station, modestly managed to ignore question, for how many months of vibration exploded hydro exceeded the norm.
In this sense, the MAC statement corresponds exactly to what visitors are which reports on the power plant. There are a lot of some nonsense, unnecessary and often malicious: "Every end of the GDP at the airport included groundwater terminal strip safety, "" a valid certificate of airworthiness for the aircraft by the Polish side has not been submitted, "" insurance of the crew did not have "; "Incidents on the site found a set of RLE in Polish," "Tupolev" the fact of an official translation of the documentation does not confirm, "" minimum number of stewards of 4 people, but actually on the plane, "there were three flight attendants."
What does the number of flight attendants, insurance crews and ground strip at the ends of the runway to have the plane crashed?
to the aircraft - no. This is - meaningless flow of words, which should impress amount of work done by the commission.
But - and this second - sometimes in this thread caught mere diamonds. For example: "determine the status light system at the time of AP (Incidents - YL) could not be "" found that the lights of the second and third groups are not available, there are pieces of lighting fixtures, cord is cut, "" lights on the first group (900m.) divided light filters, light bulbs burned out three one "; in the code beacon from the 6 bulbs missing 2.
In other words, lights (not on the runway, and on the approach) is not burned, because long ago been broken. You guys are so planted and Putin?
Thirdly, the abundance of words hides a lack of information. Because no one line report MAK no answers to critical questions.
The main question is very simple.
April 10, 2010. to useless, disorganized jitney airfield "North" Polish President boarded the plane. And on April 7 to the same plane sat Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. Question: Prime Minister delivered for extra seating equipment or not? Or he had sat on the airfield, where "on the lamp, the first group of broken filters? And if the equipment is delivered, what and why it not used for landing Kaczynski?
The report MAC word about it, although there cupola entitled "Preparation of the airfield to receive special flights 7 and 10 April, "and it poured a bucket of meaningless phrases. In particular, it says that on April 2 at the airport came a "zamkomandira in / h 21350" for providing special flights on 7 and 10 April, but what he did and his name, we are not told.
There are still several issues: why managers spoke in Russian? Why managers clearly understand where and how the plane down?
report's authors did not forget to remind us that the plane had 3 flight attendants instead of the 4-x but forgot to bring transcripts of negotiations with the dispatcher, from which it is clear that the controller gives the aircraft the wrong team.
Finally - and this is in the fourth - Direct mechanism for the disaster and the actions of pilots, leading to it, in my opinion, describes frightening and true. And I personally learned quite a lot. For example, that the crew was down too fast - the vertical velocity was 8 m / s instead of the usual 4-5m / sec. (He declined so quickly because the long-range drive came at too high altitudes.)
that someone - probably the navigator - at the moment to reduce clicked on the button permutation pressure altimeter and height of the instrument immediately changed to 160 m in the wrong direction, and, apparently, the pilots did not notice that the button pressed, and pressed it by mistake at all - instead of next.
The crew of the presidential plane made not one but several serious mistakes, and this is the typical character of the development of any catastrophe - the harder the situation, than incorrect previous decision, the less you understand where you are and what you are doing - the more you make the cumulative error.
And this difficult situation was undoubtedly angered the president of Poland and the presence in the cockpit drunken Polish Air Force Commander Gen. Blasika who like and Chief the crew was, and fog the glass saw, and did not give any orders. This is for sure - when you have drunk is behind Air Force Commander, then you will fall too quickly, and click to confuse.
But the question is - how this difficult situation was compounded by the nonsense that carried the manager, and the lack of lights second and the third group, which had hoped to consider a pilot on approach to the GDP?
IAC Report argues that the incompetence of Manager to the catastrophe does "not affected". Wow! That is a drunken commander in chief (of which the signs carefully, what piece of meat to the direction in which bounced because he was the soul of the pilots, rather than sat there, wear your) - influenced, and the dispatcher - no! And the fact that three days before the two prime ministers, the Russian and Polish, forgot to take the President of Poland with a in Katyn - is on the pilots had no effect!
Moreover. The report says that "the team manager of termination to reduce" Horizon 101 "was quite enough to take the right decision - to leave the second round. " This outright lie. Team Manager, was featured in 10.40.53,4, and the plane crashed into the ground in 10.40.59,3 - through 6 seconds. 20 seconds before the collision, when it rang alarm TAWS, the dispatcher calmly confirms: "Headlights turn on (10.40.32)", "on the course, glide path (10.40.39,9). This
impression that the report's authors have forgotten that their bureaucratic work to be read not only by Messrs. Levitin, Medvedev and Putin.
small detail. Know as the report describes the history of the MAC with neprizemleniem President Kaczynski in Georgia? It is written that "12 August 2008" presidential airplane to fly on the route Warsaw - Tallinn - Warsaw - Simferopol - Ganja. " And that the pilot refused to land in Tbilisi, quote, "due to lack of relevant aeronautical and other information on the new aerodrome of destination. " And we thought that there was war ...
That's the little bureaucratic masterpiece - about the pilot, who had refused to land the plane in Tbilisi because of lack of relevant aeronautical information - and passed on would be best MAC style report if not even one detail.
very young. Quite small.
know how many times in the MAC report mentions the word "Katyn"? Once. In describing the application flights, which gave the Polish side.
Original
0 comments:
Post a Comment