Khodorkovsky - a continuation of civil war, which has never lull in Russia since the seventeenth year. And probably not in the seventeenth begun. War between the desire for freedom and desire to slavery, among the crowd and the individual, respect for the person and contempt for him. Desire to take responsibility for their lives and a desire to hide in the depths of the swarm. Between Russia and Pushkin benkendorfovskoy, Decembrist and Arakcheyev, Tolstoy and pobedonostsevskoy, Akhmatova and Zhdanov. Battle is between two attitudes. Their own affairs - but also speeches and the fact that the most important words - Vladimir Putin became the embodiment of slavery, serfdom psychology, and Michael Khodorkovsky - a free, independent person. His latest speech indicates that he was able to rise to the heights of his position. He realized than unwittingly became and is responsible for what. This has happened in history. For example, with Boris Yeltsin.
again faced two understandings of the world. One understanding of the peculiar animal pack. World of one - is vertical, it honors the force in the form of violence, seniority, patriarchy, in other words - the hierarchy. His God - Fear. Its usual state - an insult, his consolation - revenge. He does not trust anyone because they do not trust the world, it is cynical to the bone - that is, believes that all men are the same - and, ultimately, hates life as a state of mind, which does not exist. This attitude, which led to the collapse of Russia in the twentieth century. According to the rules of such people existed almost eighty years.
world outlook of another - I judge by his deeds, speeches and so on - a sense of self rights. His world - the horizontal, all have equal rights in it, everything can be questioned, the authority is not associated with regulation, etc. There is tenderness, and lightness, and a smile. Sure on the two opposite attitude written volume. But is it enough to read the memoirs of Lyudmila Putin (if you can disappeared from everywhere to get the book) and an interview with Inna Khodorkovsky, once again to understand how attitude determines the behavior of their husbands and, eventually, policy.
Behind these two men are two Russian and two future.
Both Russia understands that lies in the balance.
Economists say the financial crisis associated with the loans. Freedom, inherited most of the so and so transformed in the twenty years of purchase of foreign affairs, was given us credit. Do not we pay for it. People who came to power, failed to conduct lustration. They did not want to be like its predecessors. In fact, it was not generosity, and cowardice. Hope that somehow will resolve itself. How come freedom itself, for which they fought and died not those who got it. Freedom in the loan.
Now have to pay.
Source:
again faced two understandings of the world. One understanding of the peculiar animal pack. World of one - is vertical, it honors the force in the form of violence, seniority, patriarchy, in other words - the hierarchy. His God - Fear. Its usual state - an insult, his consolation - revenge. He does not trust anyone because they do not trust the world, it is cynical to the bone - that is, believes that all men are the same - and, ultimately, hates life as a state of mind, which does not exist. This attitude, which led to the collapse of Russia in the twentieth century. According to the rules of such people existed almost eighty years.
world outlook of another - I judge by his deeds, speeches and so on - a sense of self rights. His world - the horizontal, all have equal rights in it, everything can be questioned, the authority is not associated with regulation, etc. There is tenderness, and lightness, and a smile. Sure on the two opposite attitude written volume. But is it enough to read the memoirs of Lyudmila Putin (if you can disappeared from everywhere to get the book) and an interview with Inna Khodorkovsky, once again to understand how attitude determines the behavior of their husbands and, eventually, policy.
Behind these two men are two Russian and two future.
Both Russia understands that lies in the balance.
Economists say the financial crisis associated with the loans. Freedom, inherited most of the so and so transformed in the twenty years of purchase of foreign affairs, was given us credit. Do not we pay for it. People who came to power, failed to conduct lustration. They did not want to be like its predecessors. In fact, it was not generosity, and cowardice. Hope that somehow will resolve itself. How come freedom itself, for which they fought and died not those who got it. Freedom in the loan.
Now have to pay.
Source:
Oleg Dorman, director: Mr. Khodorkovsky and Putin
Behind these two men are two Russian and two future ...
